From: "Richard Hemingway" <>
To: <pbird
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: Rebuilt?


> Hi Paul,
> Yes I can confirm that the college was indeed rebuilt at one stage.
> I don't have dates here with me at the moment, 'cos I'm at Warsash, but when 
> I go home next I can try and verify the dates.
> Basically what happened was, when I arrived for my abortive phase 1 term at 
> the Worcester, the footings for the shore college were in place. When I 
> returned after a period at sea to re-do the phase 1 it looked like nothing 
> had changed. I queried this, (I think with Tony Vaughn)and was told that the 
> first contractors were taken off the project for some reason by the ILEA and 
> a second contractor brought in. They then didn't like the way the first bit 
> had been done and tore parts down to be re-done, hence the delay in 
> building.
> It makes it so much harder to witness the demise of the college after so 
> much effort was put into it!
> Kind regards
> Richard.
> 
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Paul" <pbird
> To: <richyhemingway>
> Subject: Rebuilt?
> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 21:22:27 +0100
> 
> Richard,
> 
> Would you please enlarge on the following?  I have limited information about
> the origins of the college and am intrigued with the idea that it was
> wrongly built the first time and had to be re-built.
> 
> Quote
> I remember seeing the shore side college being built, being torn down, being
> rebuilt and finally residing in the newly built college for my phase 3.
> Unquote
> 
> Many Thanks
> Paul Bird
> 0771 2668093